Are Dreams Messages From The Future?

What Are Dreams?

November 22nd Revision

Books have been written on the subject of dreams. Dreams are not a new subject for scientific research, but science is a relatively new approach in the accumulation of knowledge. I argue that one doesn't need to Ph.D. to offer an opinion on the subject of dreams. Poets, and philosophers have been offering up their opinions on the subject of dreams for a very long time, and so I too will offer my ideas on the subject to my readers. I hope not to stray too far from a rational, and scientifically verifiable set of opinions.

Brain As Computer Or Tachyonic Transceiver?

I believe the way human experience is perceived falls into two basic camps.

There are those who believe that the brain, encased within the cranium, receives only those signals which are provided to it via neural pathways. This perception of the brain sees the brain as a neural chemical computer that processes data fed to it via hardwired neural inputs.

There are others who believe that the brain (the self) connects (perceives) to an "outside reality" by means that bipass the five sensory pathways.

Prescientific Ideation Related To The Nature Of Human Perception

Ideation related to the self's (brain's) connection to a "greater reality" is found in cultures throughout the modern world, and in history. This relationship is described as "Spirituality". Despite the various means of describing the relationship between self, and the "greater reality" many common themes appear to exist.


The Self, and Its Connection To Space, Time & Energy

Prescientific descriptions of the relationship between the self, space, time, matter, and energy are described by religion, and pre-religions.

Prescientific ideations defining the self's relationship to a "greater reality" include:

• Gods
• Spirits
  
• Demons
• Angels
• Ghost
• Visions
• Prophecy
• Dreams
  
• Magical Realms
  
• Magical Creatures
  
• Magical Forces
  

How is prescientific ideation connected to dreaming?

In each example of prescientific ideation, listed above, "belief" (i.e., a subset of thought) plays a vital role. Belief, or disbelief, in a god, magic belief, etc., forms the basis (matrix, or filter) of the relationship between the self, and the "greater reality".

Thought itself is the pivotal process by which the self perceives itself into existence (sentience). I think therefore I exist. Thought allows the self to question its relationship with the "greater reality".


Telepathy - A Common Theme Of Prescientific Beliefs

The relationship between thought, and the "greater reality" is given a special role in prescientific ideation. Most prescientific belief systems advocate that the self is connected to the "greater reality" in a manner not entirely dependent upon "classical channels".


Telepathy Dependent Phenomena

• Prayer
• Worship
• Communion
• Love
  
• Reverence
• Entrainment
• Meditation

Commonalities Subordinate Differences

Despite differences which exist within prescientific ideations relating to the self's connection with the "greater reality" commonalities appear. One such commonality is telepathy as a means of connection.

Prescientific Characteristics Of Telepathy

• Trans Time Conduit
  
• Trans Space Conduit
  
• Biological
• Metaphysical
  

Science And Telepathy

Is it possible that thought is transmitted beyond just a few centimeters outside the cranium?

While brainwaves are a form of radio, due to their wavelength, and wattage, they can not be detected without electronic equipment which must be positioned at a close distance. Can it be possible that thought is truly the means by which the self connects directly to the "greater reality"? Does prayer work?

Quantum Entanglement & The Tachyonic Field

Subluminal, and luminal electromagnetic fields interact with the brain. The interaction of electro magnetic waves produced by the brain with other radio waves produced outside the brain results in the creation of harmonic electromagnetic wave patterns possessing hybrid wave patterns (interference patterns). Weak electrochemically produced radio waves produced by the brain interact with natural, and man made radiation sources, and produce radio waves which can be detected at distances significantly more distant than brainwaves can.

Yet, without radio detection equipment, and brain wave pattern analysis technology could the detection, and analysis of thought, outside the general locality of the cranium be possible? Is telepathy in any of its generally recognizable forms, including prayer, possible?

In Nonlocal Effects of Chemical Substances on the Brain Produced Through Quantum Entanglement, Huping Hu, and Moaxin Wu describe experiments in which they appear to have employed quantum entanglement to create a state of sedation in test subjects.

In their controversial study they conclude:

"Several important conclusions and implications can be
drawn from our findings. First, biologically and chemically
meaningful information can be communicated via quantum
entanglement from one place to another by photons and
possibly other quantum objects such as electrons, atoms
and even molecules. Second, both classical and quantum
information can be transmitted between locations of arbitrary
distances through quantum entanglement alone. Third, in-
stantaneous signalling is physically real which implies that
Einstein’s theory of relativity is in real (not just superficial)
conflict with quantum theory. Fourth, brain processes such
as perception and other biological processes likely involve
quantum information and nuclear and/or electronic spins
may play important roles in these processes. Further, our
findings provide important new insights into the essence and
implications of the mysterious quantum entanglement and
clues for solving the long-standing measurement problem in
quantum theory including the roles of the observer and/or
consciousness. Very importantly, our findings also provide a
unified scientific framework for explaining many paranormal
and/or anomalous effects such as telepathy, telekinesis and
homeopathy, if they do indeed exist, thus transforming these
paranormal and anomalous effects into the domains of con-
ventional sciences."

While the aforementioned study was not double blinded, and needs to be replicated by others using better equipment, I suspect that further study will confirm a role for quantum entanglement in neuronal information processing.

The brain is best appreciated as a result of biological selection, and adaption. It is apparent at this juncture in our understanding of the brain that the role of quantum entanglement in the evolution, and design of the brain, must be accommodated.

In what way has the evolution, and design of the brain been altered as a result of its evolution in a tachyonic field? In what way has the pattern of the brain's neural architecture been based upon quantum entanglement?


Subconscious Capture & Processing Of Transdimensional Information Via Dreams

An early concept relating to human perception is that of the subconscious. While semantic debate continues as to the form, and definition, of the subconscious there is little argument that the vast majority of neural processing which takes place within the brain never becomes apparent to the conscious self.

Only a portion of neural processing output ever reaches conscious perception. This suggest that a large portion of processed input, and intermediary processing outputs are dropped. However, this filtration doesn't imply that the dropped data isn't stored for later processing, or that it wasn't, or won't be, included in the processing of information which is, or will be, presented to the conscious mind.

I suggest that it is the existence of the subconscious which allows for non-wave form collapsing interactions with entangled states, and the supraluminal field. The subconscious mind treads lightly upon the transdimensional interface.

I argue that while the conscious mind recognizes tardyonically obtained information, tachyonically obtained "information" is filtered through the subconscious (e.g., hunch, dreams, feelings, guesses, instinct, prophecy). This is due to the necessity of time paradox avoidance, as well as protection of the ego construct (a psychobiological defense mechanism).

The phrase "time paradox avoidance" should be interpreted as meaning that under no circumstances can a time paradox ever exist. The universe does not allow for a time paradox, and therefore "information" obtained from supraluminal sources is captured, and processed in the only way that it can be.

This doesn't in any way suggest that supraluminal interaction isn't a fundamental property of the universe, nor does it suggest that information can't be passed via a supraluminal conduit.

While there is no need for an "active" process of time paradox avoidance, interaction with the supraluminal field necessitates a means by which input is both detected, and processed in an meaningful order (with temporal, and spatial references) within a decision making system - all without violating causality.